Rosebank 1989 Signatory Vintage cask 723 + 724
Apparently there have been a few other Rosebank distilleries one time or other – one opened in the late 18th century by a pair of Stark brothers, another popped up in the early 19th century run by one James Robertson – it is unknown if this is the same distillery as the Stark’s. James Rankine built another in 1840, which is the Rosebank we know, built opposite the maltings of the old Camelon distillery across the canal, and now Scottish Canals (who bought over the site from Diageo in 1993) plans to revitalise the area by granting the abandoned buildings a new lease of life. In the works: Rosebank micro brewery. The name,it seems, does not give up the ghost so readily.
By all means this was a successful distillery, well located for transport, abundant water. James’ son R.W Rankine rebuilt Rosebank in 1864, and the next year went so far as to demolish Camelon distillery to expand the maltings for Rosebank’s use. The 2 sites were once connected by a bridge.
Times were less auspicious in 1914, when conditions precipitated by the war prompted the owners of Rosebank to merge with four other distilleries to form Scottish Malt Distillers, which of course became part of the future DCL and United Distillers, and by May 1993, United Distillers had closed Rosebank, leaving it to deteriorate sadly along the banks of the Forth & Clyde Canal. It’s fate was finally sealed in 2002 with its sale to Scottish Canals
Now the reputation of Rosebank is such that a few urban legends surround it’s ‘grievous loss’ (Michael Jackson). Chief among them is that United Distillers, in considering the lowland entry for their Classic Malts range, chose Glenkinchie over Rosebank not due to the quality of its malt but because Glenkinchie was prettier to the eye and deemed more attractive to visitors, whilst Rosebank bordered on industrial along a busy waterway. The question of quality of whisky is a nebulous one, not to cast aspersions on Glenkinchie’s malt, but enough well-regarded writers have commented on the superiority of Rosebank’s whisky that if anything, one walks away recognizing that there is no smoke without fire.
The triple stills (1 wash + 2 spirit) that produced this fine whisky were known to be ‘dumpy’shaped and utilised worm tubs present another mystery. Several sources have it that Rosebank was triple distilled till the end, yet:
One source (Brian Townsend’s Scotch Missed) claims triple distillation was used in Rosebank for decades, but according to Ulf Buxrud and the DCL archives partial triple distillation, much in the lines of Benrinnes, was used in the 20th century.
From here. It is a worthy mention that Jim Murray also believes Rosebank was 2.5 times distilled.
Alas the facts are lost to history, what you and I have left are liquid testament, at least while stocks last.
Rosebank 1989/2002, 05/04/1989 ~11/04/2002, Signatory Vintage, cask 723+724, 43%
Nose: Fresh pears and floral! Hugely scented with lots of little white and purple flowers on the kitchen table. It’s a sunny morning, with malt biscuits, cut pears and vanilla custard cream. Also new pine wood and citrus oil wood rub.
Palette: Fresh and zesty with lemon and prickly something – white pepper I think. Sweetly malted, biscuits and cream again, and new wood, but now getting sour will these herby dill and caraway flavours. It actually gets more and more sour. Lemony before the finish.
Finish: Long, lemon zest and white pepper.
Just look how pale and unadulterated it is. On the simple side but so clean and fresh, what you expect when you think refill lowland – it’s not the huge valentines bouquet, its the wildflower on the wall. Simple elegance.
Whiskyrific RSS
- Bowmore 36 yo 1969 / 2006 Duncan Taylor #6090 44% vs Bowmore 16 yo 1984 / 2000 Samaroli #61930 45%
- Longmorn 1972 / 2005 Munchner Whisky-Festival 57.3% vs Longmorn 1973 / 2011 Gordon & Macphail #3228 for Whiskyfair Limburg 58%
- Milroy’s trio: Clynelish 23 yo 1997 / 2021 Milroy’s #12359 53.3% vs Ben Nevis 25 yo 1996 / 2021 Milroy’s #20 47.6% vs Springbank 28 yo 1992 / 2021 Milroy’s #185 50.9%
- Ardbeg ‘Over 10 years old’ for Scoma by Cadenhead 58.5%
- Glen Elgin 25 yo 1995 / 2021 Signatory #3270 52.3% vs Glen Elgin 12 yo 2008 / 2020 The Whisky Exchange #805343 55.8%
- Craigellachie 23 yo 1989 / 2014 SMWS 44.59 ‘Lime marinated grilled chicken’ 51.4% vs Teaninich 21 yo 1999 / 2021 Maltbarn 48.8%
- Oban 24 yo 1989 / 2013 #748 47.8% vs Oban 12 yo Special Release 2021 56.2%
- Bruichladdich 21 yo 1964 / 1986 Intertrade 51.8% vs Bruichladdich 15 yo 1969 / 1985 Intertrade 54%
- Scapa 16 yo 1980 / 1996 Signatory #12085-86 43% vs Highland Park 27 yo 1984 / 2011 Whisky Agency 52.5%
- Caol Ila 1979 / 2010 Prenzlow Portfolio Collection #5294 57.9% vs Caol Ila 20 yo 1981 / 2001 Wilson & Morgan #276 59.2%
whiskyrific 