Rosebank 1989 Signatory Vintage cask 723 + 724
Apparently there have been a few other Rosebank distilleries one time or other – one opened in the late 18th century by a pair of Stark brothers, another popped up in the early 19th century run by one James Robertson – it is unknown if this is the same distillery as the Stark’s. James Rankine built another in 1840, which is the Rosebank we know, built opposite the maltings of the old Camelon distillery across the canal, and now Scottish Canals (who bought over the site from Diageo in 1993) plans to revitalise the area by granting the abandoned buildings a new lease of life. In the works: Rosebank micro brewery. The name,it seems, does not give up the ghost so readily.
By all means this was a successful distillery, well located for transport, abundant water. James’ son R.W Rankine rebuilt Rosebank in 1864, and the next year went so far as to demolish Camelon distillery to expand the maltings for Rosebank’s use. The 2 sites were once connected by a bridge.
Times were less auspicious in 1914, when conditions precipitated by the war prompted the owners of Rosebank to merge with four other distilleries to form Scottish Malt Distillers, which of course became part of the future DCL and United Distillers, and by May 1993, United Distillers had closed Rosebank, leaving it to deteriorate sadly along the banks of the Forth & Clyde Canal. It’s fate was finally sealed in 2002 with its sale to Scottish Canals
Now the reputation of Rosebank is such that a few urban legends surround it’s ‘grievous loss’ (Michael Jackson). Chief among them is that United Distillers, in considering the lowland entry for their Classic Malts range, chose Glenkinchie over Rosebank not due to the quality of its malt but because Glenkinchie was prettier to the eye and deemed more attractive to visitors, whilst Rosebank bordered on industrial along a busy waterway. The question of quality of whisky is a nebulous one, not to cast aspersions on Glenkinchie’s malt, but enough well-regarded writers have commented on the superiority of Rosebank’s whisky that if anything, one walks away recognizing that there is no smoke without fire.
The triple stills (1 wash + 2 spirit) that produced this fine whisky were known to be ‘dumpy’shaped and utilised worm tubs present another mystery. Several sources have it that Rosebank was triple distilled till the end, yet:
One source (Brian Townsend’s Scotch Missed) claims triple distillation was used in Rosebank for decades, but according to Ulf Buxrud and the DCL archives partial triple distillation, much in the lines of Benrinnes, was used in the 20th century.
From here. It is a worthy mention that Jim Murray also believes Rosebank was 2.5 times distilled.
Alas the facts are lost to history, what you and I have left are liquid testament, at least while stocks last.
Rosebank 1989/2002, 05/04/1989 ~11/04/2002, Signatory Vintage, cask 723+724, 43%
Nose: Fresh pears and floral! Hugely scented with lots of little white and purple flowers on the kitchen table. It’s a sunny morning, with malt biscuits, cut pears and vanilla custard cream. Also new pine wood and citrus oil wood rub.
Palette: Fresh and zesty with lemon and prickly something – white pepper I think. Sweetly malted, biscuits and cream again, and new wood, but now getting sour will these herby dill and caraway flavours. It actually gets more and more sour. Lemony before the finish.
Finish: Long, lemon zest and white pepper.
Just look how pale and unadulterated it is. On the simple side but so clean and fresh, what you expect when you think refill lowland – it’s not the huge valentines bouquet, its the wildflower on the wall. Simple elegance.
Whiskyrific RSS
- Springbank 21 yo 1996 / 2018 ‘peated type’ Whisky Agency 50.9% vs Springbank 23 yo 1994 / 2017 Nectar of the Daily Drams 50.6%
- Speyside Region Single Malt 40 yo 1975 Sansibar 50.6% vs Speyside Region Single Malt 43 yo 1973 / 2017 Liquid Treasures #9 46.5%
- Balvenie 15 yo 1974 / 1990 Signatory #18103-18130 57.1% vs Balvenie SMWS 40.1 1976 / 1997 60.6%
- White Horse America’s Cup 43% vs Pillaged Malt 10 yo Vatted Malt 57.1% ~ 1st edition bottled 2003
- Teaninich 19 yo That Boutique-y Whisky Company Batch 1 48.6% vs Teaninich 32 yo 1983 Adelphi #6738 47.8%
- Bowmore 24 yo 1991 Carn Mor #616 54.9% vs Bowmore 25 yo 1989 Douglas Laing Old Particular #10581 55.1%
- Irish Single Malt Whiskey 24 yo Batch 1 That Boutique-y Whisky Company 46.8% vs Limerick Slaney Malt Irish 23 yo 1991 / 2005 Adelphi #8585 59%
- Isle of Jura 30 yo 1966 / 1996 Signatory #1868/69 52.6% vs Isle of Jura 30 yo 1966 / 1996 Kingsbury #1867 49.7%
- Rosebank 1991 / 2009 Gordon & Macphail #2119/2120/2121 55.3% vs Rosebank 21 yo 1989 / 2010 Lombard for Three Rivers #866 58.1%
- Ben Nevis 19 yo 1996 Distiller’s Art 48% vs Ben Nevis 20 yo 1995 Gleann Mor #11308 53.4% vs Ben Nevis 22 yo 1992 Cadenhead 53.5%
