Port Morant 1975, 32 yo, Guyana Single Rum, Rendsburger, 56.9%
Feeling Whisky is getting overpriced? Fear not, premium rum is still largely undiscovered.
Previously we had a Rhum Agricole from Berry Brothers, that is to say a rum distilled from sugar cane juice instead of molasses, which is the French style (a generalization). Here we have a Guyana Single Rum from Port Morant (Mourant), this is the Demerara style of rum, named for the river in Guyana and not the sugar. It is instead distilled from molasses as is typical of rum produced in the anglophone Caribbean, though Guyana itself is on the mainland and not an island.
Coming from the world of whisky, one may be amazed to discover that this rum was distilled in wooden stills heated with steam fed pipes, the wood is said to play a similar role as copper does for whisky. The Port Morant distillery itself no longer exists, as the region’s many small distilleries merged into a large company named Demerera Distillers Limited, with a single distilery named Diamond. However the Port Mourant wooden stills were moved to the new premises and continue to operate there.
(Official picture from the DDL website) Note the wooden bottoms and copper tops.
The Diamond distillery is also famous for the world’s only wooden coffey stills, originally from the old Enmore distillery:
(Picture from thefloatingrumshack.com)
This particular rum can be purchased from the folks who run whiskyauction website, I know it is a Single rum being from the old Port Morant, but as for the kind of wood it was aged in and such, one can only guess.
Nose: Thick and pungent! Bubbling black molasses, loads of toffee, tar, soy sauce, swedish bitters (a sort of herbal tonic mix rubbed into bruises and fevered foreheads by well meaning aunts – with dubious claims of Scandinavian origin). Old leather cut into strips and blended with flavoured salt, lots of licorice, and a very fribrous vegetal strand, like standing next to the waste pile at your favourite sugar cane juice stall. Also red cherries and dark chocolate. Guess you can tell that it is a very ‘dark’nose. With water: No change, maybe a little zestier.
Palette: Hints at being sweet without actually being sweet, slight toffee flavours evaporate almost instantly with the arrival of this big soy sauce saltiness, and big tar-like medicinal earthiness. Huge mix of clove, aniseed and licorice cocoa flavours arrive. With water: No change.
Finish: Long, fibrous with a green tang. More salt, echoes of spices.
Its a huge rum with huge flavours, I’m not sure I can taste Laphroaig after this. Still a fantastic drink if only a little monolithic. Still, having almost no experience in rum, that arrow should just be ignored.
2 comments on “Port Morant 1975, 32 yo, Guyana Single Rum, Rendsburger, 56.9%”
Leave a Reply
Whiskyrific RSS
- Rosebank 14 yo 1966 / 1980 Cadenhead 46% vs Rosebank 26 yo 1967 / 1994 Scotch Single Malt Circle (Japan) #4398 51.7%
- Springbank 23 yo bottled Dec 1991 James MacArthur’s 53.7% vs Ardbeg 17 yo 1976 / 1993 Cadenhead 54.6%
- Glenfarclas over 12 years old F.W Hempel Metallurgical GmbH 45% vs Glenfarclas 25 yo 43%
- Craigellachie 12 yo 2007 / 2019 SMWS 44.113 59.9% vs Talisker 15 yo Special Release 2019 57.3%
- Glen Grant 23 yo 1992 / 2016 Cadenhead 53.1% vs Glentauchers-Glenlivet 26 yo 1990 / 2017 Cadenhead 52.6% vs Fettercairn 28 yo 1988 / 2017 Cadenhead 55.4%
- Old Pulteney 13yo 1990 /2003 Cadenhead 61.1% vs Old Pulteney 18 yo 1974 The Whisky Connoisseur #1132 57.8%
- Glen Moray 24 yo 1992 /2017 Cadenhead 50.9% vs Linkwood 24 yo 1992 / 2017 Cadenhead 50.9%
- Glen Garioch 21 yo 1992 / 2014 Liquid Library 51.6% vs Glen Garioch 21 yo 1991 / 2012 Liquid Library 52.5%
- Teaninich 11 yo 2006 / 2018 Cadenhead 55.2% vs Teaninich 10 yo 2009 / 2019 Cadenhead 55.1%
- Springbank 34 1964 / 1998 Cadenhead 52.2% vs Springbank 30 1972 / 2002 Chieftain’s #410 57.8%
Hi there, do you know if the age statement for this rum is that of the youngest or oldest(32 years) rum in the mix? Except for the A.O.C Agricole Rhums from Martinique and a few others, most age statements for rums is that of the oldest such as Ron Zacapa etc. Interesting if this is a true 32 year rum as the angel share in the tropics is several times more than in Scotland. Cheers
Hey Lewis, you’re quite right, there is some difference in the regulations on age statements for Rum in the US as opposed to Europe. I think in Europe a blended rum may bear the age of its oldest constituent, but in this case, as this is a ‘Single Rum’ with a vintage, I do believe it is an unblended rum of that vintage and age. Yes tropical angels drink a lot, I’m just amazed that there is any rum left after 32 years. Those were good points, thanks!