The Lost Distillery Company, Stratheden Blended Malt, 46%
First things first: Happy New Year! I had resolved to taste more & post more this 2015, but look it’s already the 3rd and not one post since Christmas. Very tardy!
So something quite different to start the blog off this year. Now we know that the gross majority of whisky sales are of blended whiskies. These whiskies are blended from whiskies of existing distilleries (of course) to fit a certain taste profile for the brand. It is the blender’s job to make sure Chivas 12 continues to taste like Chivas 12 batch after batch. Most of the output from distilleries feed the blenders.
Besides the big companies, there also exists a few small independent blenders like Compass Box and now the Lost Distillery Company. Unlike other blenders who blend whiskies to suit an envisioned profile, the Lost Distillery Company blends whiskies to approximate the character of the single malt of a lost distillery. And it’s not guesswork either, a respectable amount of research and debate takes place before piecing together the malt’s likely attributes. You can find out more on their website: http://www.lost-distillery.com/
The whisky at hand is called Stratheden and it is a blended malt. Stratheden itself was last operational in 1926, its closest modern neighbours are Daftmill, Strathearn and Tullibardine, so if it were around today, it would likely have been a lowlander marketing itself as a highlander? So, how ‘un-modern’ will this whisky be?
Nose: Medium weight and quite pleasing with lots of outdoorsy scents: Cereal, new leather and a seed-like oiliness is followed by green pine needles and broken branches. Almost a tromp in the park, but it’s time for tea. Glaceéd cherries, raisins and whipped cream, and afternoon tea. There’s something very delectable in this.
Palette: Sweeter now and quite a bit of this and that. Some malt, some fudge, some more leather, some tea, very juicy, some medicated camphor and quite some old wood – sandalwood?. It’s all well balanced and nothing overwhelms the others. The palette really does suggest a blend of malts here, but a good one with a number of sherry casks thrown in. Gets sappy and much hotter with more nutmeg and aniseed towards the finish.
Finish: Medium and sweetish, plus a hot mulled wine flourish.
I can’t guess what Stratheden might have tasted like, but for sure, this could be convincing. What I’m glad it doesn’t have: Heavy wood char and accompanying big prickly spices. Bananas and bourbon. Acetone and spiritiness. Instead what you get is a very well blended unrushed whisky with quite some un-modern traits, excellent I think for reminiscing those fonder moments of yesteryear.
Whiskyrific RSS
- Rosebank 14 yo 1966 / 1980 Cadenhead 46% vs Rosebank 26 yo 1967 / 1994 Scotch Single Malt Circle (Japan) #4398 51.7%
- Springbank 23 yo bottled Dec 1991 James MacArthur’s 53.7% vs Ardbeg 17 yo 1976 / 1993 Cadenhead 54.6%
- Glenfarclas over 12 years old F.W Hempel Metallurgical GmbH 45% vs Glenfarclas 25 yo 43%
- Craigellachie 12 yo 2007 / 2019 SMWS 44.113 59.9% vs Talisker 15 yo Special Release 2019 57.3%
- Glen Grant 23 yo 1992 / 2016 Cadenhead 53.1% vs Glentauchers-Glenlivet 26 yo 1990 / 2017 Cadenhead 52.6% vs Fettercairn 28 yo 1988 / 2017 Cadenhead 55.4%
- Old Pulteney 13yo 1990 /2003 Cadenhead 61.1% vs Old Pulteney 18 yo 1974 The Whisky Connoisseur #1132 57.8%
- Glen Moray 24 yo 1992 /2017 Cadenhead 50.9% vs Linkwood 24 yo 1992 / 2017 Cadenhead 50.9%
- Glen Garioch 21 yo 1992 / 2014 Liquid Library 51.6% vs Glen Garioch 21 yo 1991 / 2012 Liquid Library 52.5%
- Teaninich 11 yo 2006 / 2018 Cadenhead 55.2% vs Teaninich 10 yo 2009 / 2019 Cadenhead 55.1%
- Springbank 34 1964 / 1998 Cadenhead 52.2% vs Springbank 30 1972 / 2002 Chieftain’s #410 57.8%
