Rémy Martin Centaure Extra circa 1980s 40% / Valdespino Oloroso 20 yo ‘Solera 1842’ 20%
Right double tasting. Cognac first, an old one too. What curious treasures one find in forgotten corners of old cabinets.
Right this is a Cognac, which means a twice distilled brandy whose source grapes are grown in certain areas around the town of Cognac, and aged for a minimum of two years in French Oak barrels. Of these controlled areas, Grand Champagne stands out as the most illustrious and with the best aging potential, followed by Petite Champagne and then the other AOC zones.
The big houses are familiar names, and Rémy Martin itself is known for blending cognacs sourced only from Grand Champagne and Petite Champagne. This particular bottling from the 80s is given the Extra designation, which means the cognac is aged a minimum of six years (like XO) but usually denotes something older.
Nose: Tannic and dry cedar wood. Smells grippy already. Tobacco leaves and menthol. Golden raisins and light glazed fruit – as opposed to dark preserved fruit, not cloyingly sweet. Walnut cream and bruleed sugar. Also enough of a deep intoxicating ginger and aniseed punch that reaches up into the back of the nose. Maybe a drop of pitch too.
Palette: Sweeter here. Smooth and with some rum agricole flavours like this fibrous vegetal sweetness. Mascerated berries and toffe with lots of that dry woodiness around.
Finish: Medium and drying, more tobacco and woody spiciness.
I don’t usually drink or even like cognacs because of the over concentrated raisiny sweetness I find in many but I really love this profile. It is sweet aromatically but not cloyingly sweet and is full of dry woody and spicy counterpoints. Reminds me somewhat of a good dry oloroso butt matured whisky.
But what of Oloroso then?
Valdespino is an old Sherry bodega, and the solera this oloroso was drawn from was started in 1842. Solera? 20 years old? Yes, in solera systems the given age is an average minimum, and not the youngest sherry in the bottle. Apparently this is a Oloroso Dulce, meaning that a small quantity of old Pedro Ximenez was blended in, though this is not mentioned anywhere in the label, but is still regarded as a dry sherry.
Nose: Ok very similar to a tawny port but drier by far. Meaning thick brown honey, the rancio of brown oxidised fruit, dark roasted nuts, dry leather. And interestingly, lots of traditional coconut candy and gula melaka. Aromatic and round.
Palette: Dry with just a touch of sweetness. Burnt caramel, more thick dark honey and rancio- luscious but dry. Old wood and licorice. Not as long or full on the tongue as say a sherried whisky.
Finish: A little more sweetness shows, more brown sugar candy.
Not sure if this scale should even apply to sherry, but alright. Shows great balance, leans heavily on the dry side but aromatically rich and interesting. Isn’t that whats great in a good oloroso matured whisky too?
Whiskyrific RSS
- Strathisla 1967 / 2004 Duncan Taylor 45.9% vs Strathisla 1965 James MacArthur 51.7%
- Lagavulin 12 yo Carpano Import 43% vs Lagavulin 15 yo ceramic decanter 45%
- Eastern Highland 1975 / 1988 Samaroli Fragments of Scotland 50% (Glen Garioch) vs Glen Garioch 17 yo 1975 James MacArthur’s 54.2%
- Bowmore 10 yo Devil’s Cask Batch 1 56.9% vs Bowmore 10 yo Devils Cask Batch 2 56.3%
- Dalmore 10 yo 2006 46% vs Tomintoul 25 yo 40% ~2014 bottling vs Mackmyra Moments Ledin 48%
- Mortlach 21 yo 1957 / 1978 Cadenhead dumpy 80 proof vs Mortlach 22 yo 1969 / 1969 Cadenhead dumpy 50.5%
- Ledaig 20 yo 1972 James MacArthur 53.8% vs Ledaig 21 yo 1972 James MacArthur 54.2% vs Ledaig 18 yo James MacArthur 54.4% vs Ledaig 18 yo James MacArthur 55.2% vs Ledaig 23 yo 1972 for LMdW 51.9%
- Aberlour 30 yo 1963 James MacArthur 55.2% vs Aberfeldy 17 yo 2002 / 2019 Distillery Special #20019 54.9%
- Dalwhinnie 15 43% ~ 2009 bottling vs Dalwhinnie 27 yo 1966 / 1993 Cadenhead 45.5%
- Macallan 30 1963 / 1993 Cadenhead 54.7% vs Macallan 13 yo 1973 / 1987 SMWS 24.6 61.7%
