So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes

Inchgower 29 yo 1982/2011 Berry Bros 54.5%

Unknown, unloved and invisible Inchgower. Do we even know where it is? Who drinks this stuff? Lets check googlemaps – what?! Type in Inchgower distillery and it doesn’t even return a location. This distillery doesn’t exist?

And yet there it is, in Buckie not far from the sea, soldiering on without the apparent right to exist:

Inchogower coord


Who drinks this? Well, all of us do, as a major constituent in Bells or else any of diageo’s blends. In fact 99% of its 2 million annual litres goes into blends. So it’s a blending malt, why? Dave Broom remarks on its big muscular spirit with an intense spiciness that might pass for saltiness. Michael Jackson calls it “intense… with a jasmine-like floral character, underpinned by a resolute saltiness…”  So. 2 counts of saltiness for a Speysider 1.8km from the sea.

Besides the fact that the distillery equipment was sourced from Tochineal in 1871, remarkably little else is publicly available on this workhorse, so to its spirit I turn.


(Image – whiskyforum.se)


(Image – whiskybase)

Fat onion shape stills in use here does suggest a heavy spirit was intended.


(Commercial image)

Nose  Nose: Sandalwood, musk and old dry lacquered cabinets. An expansive nose that’s remarkably aromatic with an integration wrought by time. But then – fresh cooking oil and potpourri. Getting exotic. Dried purple flowers on the verge of mustiness. Dried lemon slices used for display only. Very strange. With water: No favours done. Heavy florals, a musty bouquet and stale fruit.

Taste  Palette: Cooking oil, liquefied dry pinewood, lavender satchets with a touch of mustiness. Getting hotter with a last burst of spice and soap. Strange but can’t fault the integration and presence. With water, with regrets: Hotter and more heavily floral. Patchouli and wilting lily.

Finish  Finish: Fairly long with sweetly stale flowers, old dry ginger from the dark recesses of the fridge. Sandalwood.



I will be generous and imagine I did not add any water. Without water: Old style maybe, certainly strange with a bit of grandpa’s house thrown in. With water: Do you like stale perfume?

After-note: I was really surprised by this, as it seems a certain venerable whisky blogger got iodine and medicinal flavours and even loved this so much he gave it a 91! All I get with water are stale flowers!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on March 1, 2015 by in Inchgower and tagged .
Follow whiskyrific on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 39 other subscribers
Whisky Advocate

So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes


So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes

The Whisky Exchange Whisky Blog

A Whisky-Lover's Whisky Blog


So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes

Whisky Science

So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes


So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes

映画 一気見

So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes

%d bloggers like this: