Benriach 11 yo 1994/2005 peated #805 vs Benriach 28 yo 1984/2013 peated PX cask for ‘Independent Spirit’ #1050
More Benriach, a rather good whisky that ought to be drunk more than it is, especially the single casks editions.
Benriach 11 yo 1994/2005 peated #805 46%
Nose: Peated malt bins, green apples, not salty but a earthy-organic compost-y rooty peat. Full of vegetal matter. Burning charcoal and woodsmoke. Also a rather buttery thick maltiness. Straightforward, does what it says it does, no flaws – the exuberence of malty youth yes but not a flaw. So yes, well drinkable. What? This was a sherry cask? Err.. Maybe 4th fill..
Palate: Exactly as promised, more big maltiness with big smokey peat all upfront here. Ash, sweet phenols, chewy and round, cereal sweetness with a light indistinct fruitiness. Actually rather good and no nonsense’.
Finish: Medium, woodsmoke, earth and malt.
Cheap and good. Will not disappoint. Hope we don’t find too much Jack Daniels in Benriach before long. (Recently bought over by Brown-Forman remember?)
Benriach 28 yo 1984/2013 peated PX cask for ‘Independent Spirit’ #1050 50.2%
Thanks Udo!
Nose: Ha. Thick syrupy and peaty with a whole array of scents to get through. This will be good. A mountain of worn out leather sofas, cedarwood, loads of rancio, and enough of that thick dry medicinals that I liken to chinese herbs. Only to be found with decent aging in good old sherry casks it seems. Old creaky oak, tobacco, some minty-pungent notes like wintergreen oil and then sweeter notes of jam, maybe something slighty fruitier too. Coal smoke, but the peat is rather heldback by the sherry here. Sound terrible but the whole is rather classic sherry plus peat.
Palate: Yes. Ok, it’s good but where does it start and where does it end, smokey buzz, sweet chewy jammy ‘oxidised’ fruit and roasty nuts. A bit of bacon? Some honey and a lot of heavy wood tannins peaking through. Cigarette ash, now becoming more laden with bitter-herbals, and surprise – that pungent green menthol really rears its head now. Peat? Not obvious at all.
Finish: Long, smoke, loads of oak, thick and dry purple sherry.
Much prefered the nose, still a great whisky – is it possible to jam any more flavours in here? You have the malt, the sherry and the peat, yes it comes together very well but it is a bit of a sensory overload.
Whiskyrific RSS
- Ledaig 20 yo Douglas Murdoch 40% vs Ledaig 21 yo 1973 Hart Brothers 43%
- Ardbeg 25 yo Lord of the Isles 46% ~early 2000s vs Ardbeg Supernova Committee 2014 55%
- Royal Brackla Gordon & Macphail Connoisseurs Choice ‘Map Label’ 1991 / 2011 46% vs Royal Brackla 23 yo 1975 / 1998 Signatory #5456 58.6%
- Brora 20 yo 1982 Whisky Connoisseur 58.6% vs Brora 12 yo 1976 / 1989 SMWS 61.1 63.6%
- Jura 30 yo 44% ~ 2012 bottling vs Jura 25 yo 1989 / 2015 Signatory #30729 60.9%
- Glen Garioch 18 yo 1975 / 1994 Cadenhead 54.9% vs Glen Garioch 13 yo 1975 / 1988 Samaroli 57%
- Glencadam 15 yo 46% ~ 2012 bottling vs ‘East Highland’ Glencadam 13 yo Cadenhead 59.4%
- Glen Grant 50 yo 1955 / 2005 Gordon &Macphail 40% vs Glenfarclas 50 yo issued 2015 41.1%
- Bowmore Bicentenary ‘Distilled in 1964’ Soffiantino import 43% vs Bowmore Bicentenary multi-vintage NAS UK issue 43%
- Glendullan-Glenlivet 25 yo 1965 / 1991 Cadenhead 51.1% vs Glenturret 25 yo 1965 / 1991 Cadenhead 52.4%
