Glen Grant 40yo 1973 Samaroli #6588 vs Glen Grant 31 yo 1970 #1025 Samaroli
Those contemplating a visit to Speyside should certainly factor in a visit to Glen Grant. The grounds are large and carefully laid out with a horticulturalist’s zeal. There is a distillery cafe and a burn runs through the middle of it. Pretty bridge, reservoir and old stone houses make choice photo ops.
But if you are at Glen Grant it is the stills that are really worth a visit:
These are very unusual stills by any measure. The wash still have distinctive squarish-domed reflux balls and a S kinked lyne arm, while the spirit stills have the tiniest bump of a reflux ball and are something like half the size of the wash stills. Both stills have purifiers with a pipe leading back to the still that has another very large S kink in it. One look at any unnamed picture and these can be no other than Glen Grant’s stills.
And what effect is intended by these odd stills? Glen Grant is generally known for a light fresh and clean whisky, at least from the mid 70s onwards, a style which made it the number 1 selling whisky in Italy.
Glen Grant 40yo 1973 Samaroli #6588 45%
Nose: A characterful nose with loads of development. The spirit is unbowed by time and sherry – which makes me happy, sharp sting of bitter sap of greens and scraped zucinis mixed in with unripe plums. The chocolately sherried side grows and dried olives and golden raisins follow suit. Cracked leather and tobacco. So its still fresh despite the big overtures of sherry.
Palate: Good. Balance is great on the tongue. Big but not overbearing sweetness with a subtle ‘lighter’ mix of purple richness, dry oak, tobacco, grated nuts and cocoa powder; and balanced by the more sour and leafy-sappy spirit. Spirit still posseses a fair gingery kick, whilst the rich aromatics of the sherry notes really shine towards the finish. Might this be a refill cask?
Finish: Long, dry aromatic and grippy, and then keeps a long hold on the tongue with this astringent leafy-ness.
Glen Grant 31 yo 1970 #1025 Samaroli 45%
Nose: Full on sherry maturation. This one is all about the wine, but it’s still rather subtle, more sit down aromatic than rambunctious richness. Dry aromatics, ancient wood, cocoa nibs and fragrant bark, the darkest of dried fruit, dried out licorice root, parched leather jackets. And some kind of wood used in perfumes.
Palate: Ah here it shows thicker tannins and the bitter pucker of some chinese medicine. Lots of woody notes actually, dried roots and burnt nuts. Something like musty cigar room. Somewhat thin in terms of body weight despite these very expressive aromatics, and it feels like the spirit caved to the wine years ago.
Finish: Long but tannic woody and bitter herbals. Unless you like old sherry and wood, then it’s heavenly.
Whiskyrific RSS
- Clynelish 90 yo 1972 / 2002 Scotch Malt Sales 58% vs Clynelish 23 yo 1974 / 1998 Rare Malts 59.1%
- Scapa 12 yo 40% ~2000 vs Scapa 8 yo Gordon & Macphail 57% ~ late 80s
- Bruichladdich 21 yo 1992 / 2014 Duncan Taylor #3987 49.7% vs Bruichladdich 22 yo 1991 / 2014 Gleann Mor #2270 55.9%
- Rosebank 26 yo 1967 / 1994 Signatory #4397 51.7% vs Rosebank 25 yo 1967 / 1993 Signatory #4393-4394 54.4%
- Macduff 40 yo 1968 / 2008 Duncan Taylor #8547 45.5% vs Deanston 23 yo 1967 / 1991 Signatory #1785 55.4%
- Highland Park 22 yo Cadenhead 80 proof vs Highland Park 14 yo 1978 / 1993 Cadenhead 55.2%
- Dailuaine 31 yo 1966 / 1997 Cadenhead 57.1% vs Dailuaine 22 yo 1973 / 1996 Rare Malts 60.92%
- Brora 1972 / 1996 Gordon & Macphail Connoisseurs Choice 40% vs Brora 24 yo 1977 / 2001 Rare Malts 56.1% vs Brora 19 yo 1982 / 2001 Chieftains #1189/1192 46%
- Clynelish 12 yo for Whiskyteca Edward & Edward long cap 56.9% vs Clynelish 12 yo for Whiskyteca Edward & Edward bicolour 56.9%
- Talisker 30 yo 1953 Gordon & Macphail 40% vs Talisker 1957 Gordon & Macphail 53.5%
