Glendullan 1997 Connoisseurs Choice vs Glen Keith 1993 Connoisseurs Choice
The Gordon & Macphail Connoisseurs Choice series is an old one that’s been refreshed many times over. We’ve seen the original brown paper label iteration under which many old 60s and 70s malts had been bottled. This pair on hand were bottled in 2011 and I believe there’s already been one label redesign since. What has not changed, however, was the original purpose as intended by G&M – this range was intended as an entry level showcase of less available distilleries at their basic drinking strength. Consequentially, and I love this, the modern Connoisseurs Choice were were generally drawn from an refill ex bourbon palette making them usually very naked and honest whiskies.
Glendullan 1997 Gordon & Macphail Connoisseurs Choice 43% ~bottled 2011
Nose: Buttery malty naked whisky, very natural but also very middle of the road, exactly what a great blending malt should be. Dusty hay, cereals, medium oiliness. Some warm minerals, and shades of yellow like pollen and honey and also some citrus zest. Fair weight, not heavy or light. Quite archetypical so … building blocks of a decent blended whisky.
Palate: Yes medium bodied, malty-sweet, some light butter, toasty honey, hay and sunshine , some light pepper, barest hints of oak lactones. Gets drying with some crispness to the finish
Finish: Medium, hot minerals, warm cereals. Dry crisp finish.
Glen Keith 1993 Gordon & Macphail Connoisseurs Choice 46% ~bottled 2011
Nose: Surprise! These Glen Keiths have been surprising me of late. A swelling but indistinct fruitiness begging to be cultivated, some green freshness, like green kiwis or green grapes, tart and fruity at the same time. Clear vegetable oil, light and supple in the glass. Not a very malty or heavy sort of whisky. Just good whisky from a very underappreciated distillery.
Palate: Fruity sweet, like a multi fruit vitamin juice – with a fair citrus portion it seems. Medium light body, gentle oiliness, fizzy buzz. If you like these single cask Irish Single Malts, or 90s Littlemill, this is one distillery to watch.
Finish: Medium, fairly sweet, some oils and biscuits. Wholesome.
Whiskyrific RSS
- Clynelish 90 yo 1972 / 2002 Scotch Malt Sales 58% vs Clynelish 23 yo 1974 / 1998 Rare Malts 59.1%
- Scapa 12 yo 40% ~2000 vs Scapa 8 yo Gordon & Macphail 57% ~ late 80s
- Bruichladdich 21 yo 1992 / 2014 Duncan Taylor #3987 49.7% vs Bruichladdich 22 yo 1991 / 2014 Gleann Mor #2270 55.9%
- Rosebank 26 yo 1967 / 1994 Signatory #4397 51.7% vs Rosebank 25 yo 1967 / 1993 Signatory #4393-4394 54.4%
- Macduff 40 yo 1968 / 2008 Duncan Taylor #8547 45.5% vs Deanston 23 yo 1967 / 1991 Signatory #1785 55.4%
- Highland Park 22 yo Cadenhead 80 proof vs Highland Park 14 yo 1978 / 1993 Cadenhead 55.2%
- Dailuaine 31 yo 1966 / 1997 Cadenhead 57.1% vs Dailuaine 22 yo 1973 / 1996 Rare Malts 60.92%
- Brora 1972 / 1996 Gordon & Macphail Connoisseurs Choice 40% vs Brora 24 yo 1977 / 2001 Rare Malts 56.1% vs Brora 19 yo 1982 / 2001 Chieftains #1189/1192 46%
- Clynelish 12 yo for Whiskyteca Edward & Edward long cap 56.9% vs Clynelish 12 yo for Whiskyteca Edward & Edward bicolour 56.9%
- Talisker 30 yo 1953 Gordon & Macphail 40% vs Talisker 1957 Gordon & Macphail 53.5%
