Clynelish 28 yo 1965/1993 Signatory #666 50.7% vs Clynelish 23 yo 1965/1989 Cadenhead 51.7%
I’ve been itching to do 1965 Clynelish (ie old Clynelish, the one that was renamed Brora) head to head, unfortunately it is not easy to find these old ones. Ideally I would liked to have both #666 and #667 together, but oh well:
Clynelish 28 yo 1965/1993 Signatory #666 50.7%
Nose: The oak is fairly loud here – its one of those old oak casks that combines the wonderful aromatics of ancient crackling panels and centuries of genuine lacquer with a veneer of dried jams or some exotic berry paste. Seems closer to a sandalwood incense box really but thankfully the wood is all fairly controlled. The whisky also speaks of coal, wet rocks, dried branches a bit of black earth and whiffs of sea air. It is a sharp and narrow profile maybe the opposite of fat, but the exactness or conciseness of this profile is spine tingling. The concentration of many little ‘similar but different’ micro scents is apparent, it’s an olfactory bulls eye. This style of old Clynelish makes me very happy.
Palate: The ‘sherry cask’ this was matured in seems louder here, and makes the profile fatter and sweeter or you might say rounder. But Clynelish does shine through, or cut through – its a sharp acidic tangy dagger of a Clynelish full of phenol-lite elements like this coal and clean black earth. One might even imagine some distant smoke and brine in the air at the top of a cliff. Still flinty and mineralled, and ‘dried out’ with this particular dried-resiny-sappy branches and leaves.
Finish: Long. Sharp and drying not quite tannic. Full spread of micro-minerals-resins-bark-phenols-earthy complexities make this a great whisky.
Clynelish 23 yo 1965/1989 Cadenhead 51.7%
Unfortunately all I have is a sample:
Nose: Wow. Turn the volume up. Take the #666, strip out the obvious wood, and fill it with a bigger more concentrated dose of the remaining Clynelish, and you might get this one. Amazing. I love it. An even bigger concentration of these micro flavours, with a sharp acid edge, an array of mineral oils, mini blades of quartz, granite, flints. Again scents of what might be windblown dried out grasses or scraggly bushes you might find at a clifftop, hints of rock salt and sea air. Desiccated calamansi even. Rather phenolic too, but the kind that sits in the higher register – dried up tins of old greases, clean hemp rope, unburnt dried peat heaps (shedloads of this on Islay!). I feel this kind of whisky cannot be described adequately, one needs to try it.
Palate: Explosive and phenolic without being peaty. Lots of clean but dirty (?) notes like soot, dried grease, cold ash. Old resins and engine lubricants. Thick mineral oils. ‘Windswept’. The dried citrus notes make a come back as well. Sharp, acidic and insanely deep, it’s a stiletto of a malt. I love it.
Finish: Long, and lasting with great aplomb. It persists on the tongue with a myriad of micro flavours.
Whiskyrific RSS
- Hampden 7 yo 2010 Velier 62% vs Long Pond 15 yo 2003 1200/1300 ‘Continental Flavoured’ TECA 63%
- Highland Park 1982 / 1994 Gordon & Macphail Cask #784-786, 788 56.9% vs Highland Park 1983 / 1992 Gordon & Macphail Cask #1556 59.7%
- Croftengea 2008 / 2018 #272 for The Whisky Exchange 54.8% vs Croftengea 11 yo 2007 / 2018 #209 The Single Cask 60.2%
- St Magdalene 30 yo 1975 / 2005 Silver Seal 50% vs Linlithgow (St Magdalene) 1982 / 2008 #2220 Carn Mor 61.8%
- Scapa 24 yo 1965 / 1990 Cadenhead 50.1% vs Scapa 25 yo 1980 / 2005 54%
- Bowmore 16 yo Cadenhead Sheriff’s Bowmore Distillery 46% vs Bowmore 13 yo Cadenhead Sheriff’s Bowmore Distillery 80 proof
- Ardbeg Provenance 2nd Release for the US 23 yo 1974 / 1998 54.7% vs Ardbeg Provenance 1st release 23 yo 1974 / 1997 55.6%
- Strathisla 1965 / 2011 #3473 vs Tamdhu 21 yo 1990 Old & Rare Douglas Laing
- Strathisla 34 yo 1937 / 1972 Gordon and Macphail for Pinerolo 43% vs Macallan 1947 securo cap Campbell, Hope & King for Rinaldi 80 proof
- Pechuga Del Maguey PEC-131 49% vs Pierde Almas Conejo 2015 Lote: 06-PC 51%
