Springbank 17yo 1989 ACEO #145 vs Batch 1 That Boutique-y Whisky Company vs 15yo 1996 Director’s Cut #8700
Out of the veritable graveyard of distilleries that is Campbeltown comes mankind’s last best chance for peace hope future traditional whisky. And its true too. The only place in Scotland where barley becomes bottled whisky in one place.
If you love Springbank you know it comes with a particular profile. Lets see if we can find it in some of their newer make. I know I have waxed soporific about Springbank in other posts so will keep this short.
Springbank is virtually by the roadside.
Springbank 17yo 1989 ACEO ltd #145 50.1%
Nose: Naked 90s Springbank. So rather sour green apples and unripe peaches, with the coast a stone’s throw away. Engine oil and saltwater. I’ll just ignore the usual cream and malt that’s de rigeur with naked noses. Err.. butter biscuits. Also quite farmy this one – with hay and a ‘used’ stable that hasn’t become too ripe yet. Really good nose actually, comes together really well. A maritime side, a light phenolic side, and then a touch of lush speyside, it’s Springbank.
Palate: Salt first then farmy notes more than nose quite entertaining with little smoky oily phenolic notes popping up. Rather good! Going closer and closer to the sting of those unripe fruits towards the finish.
Finish: Medium long, salt, woody, unripe fruit, you want more of this.
Really enjoyed this. Rather multi faceted with great complex development on the palate. I also appreciate the dollop of individuality.
Springbank Batch 1 That Boutique-y Whisky Company 54.6%
That’s the porteus mill being pedal powered by the way, not sure if it is some sort of inside joke…
Nose: This one has lots of fresh cut vegetable leaves, milky plant sap and clean high toned florals to start. Out in the garden trimming the shrubs, collecting the debris in a pile. Something like rusty shears and WD40. Yes very grassy. Already smells very acidic
Palate: Curious, completely different from its nose. Mysteriously, a touch farmy but far less than the ACEO, sweet wood, and some salt, actually really similar to the ACEO now. What happened to all the green-ness in the nose?
Finish: Medium, here’s the green. Dried grass and sap covered garden gloves, bit of phenols again.
Loses points for being inconsistent. Good to surprise friends with really. But all in all also extremely drinkable.
Springbank 15yo 1996 Director’s Cut Douglas Laing #8700 56.3%
Nose: Oh ouch. Really woody. Oak tannins, fibrous vegetal spinters of cellulose. Carbonised sugar. Heavily charred wood. Was this a virgin barrel? Liquified baseball bat. Not getting much besides this onslaught of wood.
Palate: Sweet. Fudge and caramel and cream.. and way, way too much wood. Pointless.
Finish: Wood.
Cheaper to chew on chopsticks.
2 comments on “Springbank 17yo 1989 ACEO #145 vs Batch 1 That Boutique-y Whisky Company vs 15yo 1996 Director’s Cut #8700”
Leave a Reply
Whiskyrific RSS
- Bowmore 36 yo 1969 / 2006 Duncan Taylor #6090 44% vs Bowmore 16 yo 1984 / 2000 Samaroli #61930 45%
- Longmorn 1972 / 2005 Munchner Whisky-Festival 57.3% vs Longmorn 1973 / 2011 Gordon & Macphail #3228 for Whiskyfair Limburg 58%
- Milroy’s trio: Clynelish 23 yo 1997 / 2021 Milroy’s #12359 53.3% vs Ben Nevis 25 yo 1996 / 2021 Milroy’s #20 47.6% vs Springbank 28 yo 1992 / 2021 Milroy’s #185 50.9%
- Ardbeg ‘Over 10 years old’ for Scoma by Cadenhead 58.5%
- Glen Elgin 25 yo 1995 / 2021 Signatory #3270 52.3% vs Glen Elgin 12 yo 2008 / 2020 The Whisky Exchange #805343 55.8%
- Craigellachie 23 yo 1989 / 2014 SMWS 44.59 ‘Lime marinated grilled chicken’ 51.4% vs Teaninich 21 yo 1999 / 2021 Maltbarn 48.8%
- Oban 24 yo 1989 / 2013 #748 47.8% vs Oban 12 yo Special Release 2021 56.2%
- Bruichladdich 21 yo 1964 / 1986 Intertrade 51.8% vs Bruichladdich 15 yo 1969 / 1985 Intertrade 54%
- Scapa 16 yo 1980 / 1996 Signatory #12085-86 43% vs Highland Park 27 yo 1984 / 2011 Whisky Agency 52.5%
- Caol Ila 1979 / 2010 Prenzlow Portfolio Collection #5294 57.9% vs Caol Ila 20 yo 1981 / 2001 Wilson & Morgan #276 59.2%
whiskyrific 
That’s quite the review on the 15 year Douglas Laing Director’s cut! Ouch!
I know.. I even felt bad!