Clynelish 17 yo 1995 Signatory #12796 vs Clynelish 18 yo 1996/2015 Whiskybroker #11448 vs Clynelish 17 yo 1997/2015 Lady of the Glen #12363
Some 90s Clynelish. The vintages you commonly see are 1995, 1996 and especially 1997, so in a vertical:
Clynelish 17 yo 1995/2012 Signatory #12796 ‘Ibisco Decanter’ 43%
Nose: Classic! Starts with beeswax and paraffin, and it’s a very ‘clean’ one too, then moving on to hot stones, chalk, kaolin. They even added a teaspoon of gin. Very expressive at 43%, though tad simple.
Palate: Yes 43% is a bit weak but this is no weak whisky, quite a bit of celery juice and a flinty mineral edge that makes you think of licking granite. Bitter herbals, angelica? And then some clean black earth and bark, moving on very quickly to something like cold extinguished campfire.
Finish: A bit short but what a show this whisky has put up already. More charcoal and angelica.
Low proof yes but the quality is great and the markers there. A big waxy one that may not be out of place a few years earlier.
Clynelish 18 yo 1996/2015 Whiskybroker #11448 54.1%
Nose: This one is ridden with bourbon but the spirit holds up well. Under all that vanilla and sweet wood there is a flinty cold edge. Carbon paper or graphite. Quite a lot of these dirty sooty coal and engine grease notes too, but it does feel constrained by the bourbon.
Palate: Yes immediately sweet and woody, but lots of Sugar mints and spearmint gum. Then cold firepit, cold ash, graphite and cold tar.
Finish: Rather long, but again bananas, caramel, brulee, and just a tiny bit of Clynelish.
Clynelish in a first fill bourbon barrel can only take so much, it does feel numbed by the overpowering sweetness.
Clynelish 17 yo 1997/2015 Lady of the Glen #12363 54.9%
With many thanks Keith Chong! Also ripped off your picture –
Nose: Back on track. This one is very mineralled, also lots of thick paraffin and candlewax. Quite a lot going on. Honey and something ‘yellow’. Pollen? Carbon paper again.
Palate: Yes. Some wax, some honey but it’s the sharp mineralled side that speaks most. White wine, though not a woody one. Clean dry and sharp. More carbon notes. Maybe even a little salted caramel. Towards the finish some really gin like notes show up – juniper and cucumber. Best complexity of the 3. Really good actually, though not ‘easy’.
Finish: Long immaculate, squeaky clean.
Excellent form and high quality, though by nature less approachable than the waxy 1995 or bourbony 1996. Still, a whisky lover’s whisky.
Whiskyrific RSS
- Speyside Region Single Malt 40 yo 1975 Sansibar 50.6% vs Speyside Region Single Malt 43 yo 1973 / 2017 Liquid Treasures #9 46.5%
- Balvenie 15 yo 1974 / 1990 Signatory #18103-18130 57.1% vs Balvenie SMWS 40.1 1976 / 1997 60.6%
- White Horse America’s Cup 43% vs Pillaged Malt 10 yo Vatted Malt 57.1% ~ 1st edition bottled 2003
- Teaninich 19 yo That Boutique-y Whisky Company Batch 1 48.6% vs Teaninich 32 yo 1983 Adelphi #6738 47.8%
- Bowmore 24 yo 1991 Carn Mor #616 54.9% vs Bowmore 25 yo 1989 Douglas Laing Old Particular #10581 55.1%
- Irish Single Malt Whiskey 24 yo Batch 1 That Boutique-y Whisky Company 46.8% vs Limerick Slaney Malt Irish 23 yo 1991 / 2005 Adelphi #8585 59%
- Isle of Jura 30 yo 1966 / 1996 Signatory #1868/69 52.6% vs Isle of Jura 30 yo 1966 / 1996 Kingsbury #1867 49.7%
- Rosebank 1991 / 2009 Gordon & Macphail #2119/2120/2121 55.3% vs Rosebank 21 yo 1989 / 2010 Lombard for Three Rivers #866 58.1%
- Ben Nevis 19 yo 1996 Distiller’s Art 48% vs Ben Nevis 20 yo 1995 Gleann Mor #11308 53.4% vs Ben Nevis 22 yo 1992 Cadenhead 53.5%
- Lagavulin 25 yo 200th Anniversary 51.7% ~2016 vs Lagavulin 30 yo 52.6% ~ 2006
