whiskyrific

So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes

St. Magdalene 30 yo 1982/2013 Douglas Laing Old & Rare vs St. Magdalene 25 yo 1982/2008 Blackadder butt # 2180

Out of action following a very busy season, followed by a severe nose killing flu. Back now, and looking for a challenge, so St. Magdalene it is. I know some friends are bewildered when I say I quite enjoy this whisky, because it’s generally not a very likeable whisky at all. In fact it can be downright difficult, can I say it’s cantankerously charming? Note that this was a double distilled Lowlander till its closure in 1983. Sadly I can’t find a picture of her stills online. It would be very interesting to have a look given her whisky has always been interesting, whichever way you put it.

St. Magdalene 30 yo, 1982/2013 refill butt Douglas Laing Old & Rare 58.5%

Thanks Antoine!

 Nose: These later St. Magdalene seem to very high toned compared to some from the 70s. It’s a thin mix of diesel, clear medicinal oils, grass clippings, old dank camphor packets. Also work shed musty-ness, damp wood, dirty old tools, and something I have found in other ’82 St. Magdalenes that suggests this one is going to bite, I want to say battery acid but it’s more like how you smell unripe pineapple and imagine the bromelain bite. Also the merest hint of stewed jam gives the butt away. Not an easy nose – not very giving, you need to work it.

 Palate: The jammy sweetness makes a first show, but it’s swept away by the grass and bark, oxalic acid, rusty drums, singer oil, toolbox, damp and decaying wood. It does bite. Very high toned and incision-tool sharp rather than being big and mellow. Feels acidic and gives the impression of a tannic dryness. Again not an easy whisky.

 Finish: Medium, sharp and acidic, still biting. Grass and old tools linger.

 

 

St. Magdalene 25 yo, 1982/2008 Blackadder butt # 2180 61.8%

 Nose: Very similar with the same ‘acid’, but this one is much more expressive. Less tool shed, more vegetal – this one has more of some cooked vegetable mash, stripped bark showing the white live wood. Very dry grass and other pruned leaves plus dried sap and other herbal scents. Also very high toned and somewhat phenolic though not as sharp.

 Palate: Quite massive and it’s not just the strength. Huge bite, almost angry. White hot, volcanic peppers. Then raw greens and a host of herbal nuances like the nose. Some diesel and mineral oils. Quite some minerals too actually. Not an easy whisky again, I can imagine some people hating this, but I quite enjoyed it – neat too.

 Finish: Long, grassy, sooty, mineralled, the bite lingers too.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on May 28, 2017 by in Linlithgow, St. Magdalene and tagged , .
Follow whiskyrific on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 18 other followers

Whisky Advocate

So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes

WHISKY REVIEWS

So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes

The Whisky Exchange Whisky Blog

A Whisky-Lover's Whisky Blog

Dramming

So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes

Whisky Science

So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes

TheMaltedMilk

So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes

The Singapore Whisky Blog

So much whisky, so little time | Singapore | Tasting Notes

%d bloggers like this: